<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Prescription for Change</title>
      <link>http://www.prescriptionforchange.org/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:47:47 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.2</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Health insurance didn&apos;t start out this way</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Health insurance hasn't proven to be the best market for head to head competition. Rather than improving price and service, companies began to increase profits by picking the healthy and shedding the sick.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.prescriptionforchange.org/2010/03/health_insurance_didnt_start_o.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.prescriptionforchange.org/2010/03/health_insurance_didnt_start_o.html</guid>
         <category>Blog Post</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:47:47 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Insurance execs sit on bags of money, while policyholders feel the pinch</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>States can’t even keep health insurance rates down when the insurance company is sitting on piles and piles of surplus cash (and investments).</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.prescriptionforchange.org/2010/03/insurance_execs_sit_on_bags_of.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.prescriptionforchange.org/2010/03/insurance_execs_sit_on_bags_of.html</guid>
         <category>Blog Post</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 15:07:56 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>In case you were wondering, we&apos;ve been at this a year now</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Those who say we should scrap the health reform bill and start over have yet to say what would happen differently the next time. It took a year to get to this point--with efforts to reach compromises large and small dating back to this time last year.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.prescriptionforchange.org/2010/03/in_case_you_were_wondering_wev.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.prescriptionforchange.org/2010/03/in_case_you_were_wondering_wev.html</guid>
         <category>Blog Post</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:21:43 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>In the alternative, fund high risk pools?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Rather than try and insure everyone, perhaps we should just try and insure the sick people. The problem is, states have been trying that idea for years and it's time we learn from failure.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.prescriptionforchange.org/2010/02/in_the_alternative_fund_high_r.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.prescriptionforchange.org/2010/02/in_the_alternative_fund_high_r.html</guid>
         <category>Blog Post</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:01:29 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Breathtaking cost savings claims are nothing but hot air</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>In Sunday's New York Times, Newt Gingrich announced that tort reform would save the health care system $600 billion a year--a breathtaking number, but unfounded.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.prescriptionforchange.org/2010/02/breathtaking_cost_savings_clai.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.prescriptionforchange.org/2010/02/breathtaking_cost_savings_clai.html</guid>
         <category>Blog Post</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:10:31 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Free markets? Compete across state lines? They alone won&apos;t solve our health insurance problems</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>As Washington tries to come together on a health reform plan, opponents are still throwing out the same old ‘solutions’ that they claim will lower costs and get more folks health coverage. The only problem is, they don’t.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.prescriptionforchange.org/2010/02/post_40.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.prescriptionforchange.org/2010/02/post_40.html</guid>
         <category>Blog Post</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:46:42 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Empty threats--Agencies probably can&apos;t stop Anthem rate increase</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>California insurance regulators, federal agency heads and Congress are all responding to Anthem's huge rate increases with, well, saber rattling. Because the rate increase is probably perfectly legal under existing insurance law--a law that works great for insurance companies and not so great for people. That's why so many millions of Americans desperately need Congress to finish and pass health reform.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.prescriptionforchange.org/2010/02/empty_threatsagencies_probably_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.prescriptionforchange.org/2010/02/empty_threatsagencies_probably_1.html</guid>
         <category>Blog Post</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:09:47 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Simple ideas turn out to be pretty complicated after all</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Would a few simple changes to the way health insurance works fix our health care system? Consumer Reports is looking at the ideas now circulating. See what our investigations come up with.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.prescriptionforchange.org/2010/02/simple_ideas_turn_out_to_be_pr_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.prescriptionforchange.org/2010/02/simple_ideas_turn_out_to_be_pr_1.html</guid>
         <category>Blog Post</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:34:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Afraid of health care legislation?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>If so, relax. You’re probably all worked up about four of the myths polluting this debate.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.prescriptionforchange.org/2010/01/afraid_of_health_care_legislat.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.prescriptionforchange.org/2010/01/afraid_of_health_care_legislat.html</guid>
         <category>Blog Post</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:23:33 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Top priority: Making sure insurance is affordable</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Health insurance must be affordable for American families if we are all to buy it. So how do we get there?</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.prescriptionforchange.org/2010/01/the_insurance_must_be_affordab_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.prescriptionforchange.org/2010/01/the_insurance_must_be_affordab_1.html</guid>
         <category>Blog Post</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 13:36:56 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>It’s not sexy, but the new ‘insurance exchange’ could be the key to good health reform </title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>You probably haven’t heard much about the proposed ‘insurance exchange’ in the health reform bills.  It doesn’t make sexy fodder for political talk shows. But it very well could be one of the most important things Congress does to get health reform right – and the Senate and House bills take different approaches to the exchange. How they’re combined in the final bill could make all the difference to health reform’s success.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.prescriptionforchange.org/2010/01/its_not_sexy_but_the_new_insur.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.prescriptionforchange.org/2010/01/its_not_sexy_but_the_new_insur.html</guid>
         <category>Blog Post</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 14:07:59 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Fighting for the best possible final health reform bill</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The next few weeks we’ll see <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/04/health.care/">furious work in Washington </a>on a final health reform bill, as both House and Senate leaders attempt to <a href="http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2010/01/04/gvl10104.htm">merge their respective bills </a>into one measure that gives all Americans access to affordable, reliable health coverage.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.prescriptionforchange.org/2010/01/fighting_for_the_best_possible.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.prescriptionforchange.org/2010/01/fighting_for_the_best_possible.html</guid>
         <category>Blog Post</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:03:50 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>No insurance and too young to qualify for Medicare? How health reform would fill the gap</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>As Consumer Reports senior editor Nancy Metcalf points out, <a href="http://blogs.consumerreports.org/health/2009/09/how-health-reform-can-help-the-uninsured-age-65-and-people-with-preexisting-conditions.html">losing your health coverage in middle-age </a>can be a real disaster because most people in "mid-life" have some kind of pre-existing condition that makes insurance companies shun them. Or if they are lucky enough to get coverage, the costs of the policies are simply outrageous.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.prescriptionforchange.org/2009/12/no_insurance_and_too_young_for.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.prescriptionforchange.org/2009/12/no_insurance_and_too_young_for.html</guid>
         <category>Blog Post</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 11:40:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Senate will vote to begin debate; expect to hear a lot about the public option</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>This weekend <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/18/AR2009111802014.html?hpid=topnews">the Senate will vote to begin debate </a>on its health reform bill -- needing 60 votes just to begin talking about the issue on the floor and allowing amendments. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.prescriptionforchange.org/2009/11/post_39.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.prescriptionforchange.org/2009/11/post_39.html</guid>
         <category>Blog Post</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:22:25 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Reasons why the House bill is a workable solution to our health care problems</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Any proposal that addresses one-fifth of our economy, and deals with an issue as important to Americans as their health care, deserves our careful reading and intense scrutiny. With that firmly in mind, and with our decades of experience analyzing incremental health reforms at the state and federal levels, Consumers Union supports H.R. 3962, the Affordable Health Care for America Act. We believe this bill contains workable solutions to the critical problem that so many Americans face right now – namely, the inability to afford dependable, quality health care. <br />
<a href="http://www.prescriptionforchange.org/2009/11/why_consumers_union_supports_t.html">To read about our reasons why, click here.</a></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.prescriptionforchange.org/2009/11/reasons_why_the_house_bill_is_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.prescriptionforchange.org/2009/11/reasons_why_the_house_bill_is_1.html</guid>
         <category>Blog Post</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:39:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
